A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM: HERBERT L. PACKER’S MODELS OF THE CRIMINAL PROCESS AND THEIR MODERN SIGNIFICANCE

Authors

  • Gulomov Abdulaxadxon NamDU yuridik fakultetining ikkinchi kurs talabasi Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21376643

Keywords:

criminal process, Herbert Packer, Crime Control, Due Process, human rights, public safety, presumption, presumption of innocence, efficiency.

Abstract

This article provides an in-depth analysis of the fundamental theory "Two Models of the Criminal Process" developed by the prominent legal scholar Herbert L. Packer. The study examines two competing conceptual frameworks that govern the criminal justice system: the "Crime Control Model" and the "Due Process Model." It offers a comparative legal analysis of the characteristics, value systems, and procedural differences between these models as proposed by the author, highlighting their role in balancing individual rights and public safety.

References

Packer, H. L. (1964). Two Models of the Criminal Process. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 113(1), 1–68.

Packer, H. L. (1968). The Limits of the Criminal Sanction. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Ashworth, A., & Redmayne, M. (2010). The Criminal Process (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sanders, A., Young, R., & Burton, M. (2010). Criminal Justice (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Damaska, M. (1973). Evidentiary Barriers: Some Comparative Reflections on Two Models of the Criminal Process. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 121(3), 506–589.

Roach, K. (1999). Four Models of the Criminal Process. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 89(2), 671–716. (Packer modellarini kengaytirgan zamonaviy tadqiqot).

Griffiths, J. (1970). Ideology in Criminal Procedure or A Third Model of the Criminal Process. Yale Law Journal, 79(3), 359–417.

Goldstein, A. S. (1974). Reflections on Two Models: Crime Control and Due Process. Yale Law Journal, 83(5), 1002–1025.

McBarnet, D. J. (1981). Conviction: Law, the State and the Construction of Justice. London: Macmillan.

King, M. (1981). The Framework of Criminal Justice. London: Croom Helm.

Feeley, M. M. (1973). Two Models of the Criminal Justice System: An Organizational Perspective. Law & Society Review, 7(3), 407–425.

Duff, R. A. (2001). Punishment, Communication, and Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fletcher, G. P. (1978). Rethinking Criminal Law. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.

Ingraham, B. L. (1987). The Structure of Criminal Procedure: Laws and Practice of France, the Soviet Union, China, and the United States. New York: Greenwood Press.

Cape, E., Hodgson, J., Prakken, T., & Spronken, T. (2007). Suspects in Europe: Procedural Rights at the Investigative Stage of the Criminal Process. Antwerp: Intersentia.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Gulomov, A. (2026). A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM: HERBERT L. PACKER’S MODELS OF THE CRIMINAL PROCESS AND THEIR MODERN SIGNIFICANCE. Young Scientists, 4(63), 4-8. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21376643
Innovative Academy RSC
Article metrics Views and PDF downloads
2 Views
0 Downloads