DIDACTIC FOUNDATIONS OF MATHEMATICS TEACHING ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-BASED INTERACTIVE PLATFORMS
Ключевые слова:
artificial intelligence, mathematics education, interactive platforms, didactic principles, adaptive learning, intelligent tutoring systems, formative feedback, quasi-experimental research, constructivism, digital pedagogyАннотация
The rapid proliferation of artificial intelligence technologies has created transformative opportunities in mathematics education at secondary and higher educational levels. This study examines the didactic foundations that underpin the design and pedagogical effectiveness of AI-based interactive platforms in the teaching of mathematics. Drawing on constructivist, cognitivist, and connectivist learning theories, the research investigates how AI-driven features — including adaptive learning paths, intelligent tutoring systems (ITS), instant formative feedback, and dynamic visualisation — align with established didactic principles. A quasi-experimental study (n = 91) conducted over one academic semester at Shahrisabz State Pedagogical Institute compared an experimental group using AI-enhanced platforms against a control group receiving conventional instruction. Post-test analysis revealed highly significant performance gains in the experimental group (mean gain: +25.9 points; Cohen's d = 2.49; p < 0.001), a reduction in mathematical misconceptions from 44.8% to 11.3%, and a student satisfaction rate of 89.1%. The study proposes an eight-phase AI-Mediated Didactic Cycle as a replicable instructional framework for mathematics educators.
Библиографические ссылки
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285.
Atkinson, R. K., Derry, S. J., Renkl, A., & Wortham, D. (2000). Learning from examples: Instructional principles from the worked examples research. Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 181–214.
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.
VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197–221.
Pane, J. F., Steiner, E. D., Baird, M. D., Hamilton, L. S., & Pane, J. D. (2017). Informing progress: Insights on personalized learning implementation and effects. RAND Corporation.
Mollick, E. R., & Mollick, L. (2023). Assigning AI: Seven approaches for students, with prompts. SSRN Working Paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4475995
Drijvers, P., Doorman, M., Boon, P., Reed, H., & Gravemeijer, K. (2010). The teacher and the tool: Instrumental orchestrations in the technology-rich mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(2), 213–234.
Hohenwarter, M., Hohenwarter, J., Kreis, Y., & Lavicza, Z. (2008). Teaching and learning calculus with free dynamic mathematics software GeoGebra. In 11th International Congress on Mathematical Education. Monterrey, Mexico.
Shepard, R. N. (1978). The mental image. American Psychologist, 33(2), 125–137.
Tashkentov, A. (2022). Digital readiness in Uzbek higher education: Challenges and prospects. Journal of Education and Innovation, 4(2), 45–59.
Karimov, B., & Yusupova, D. (2023). Infrastructure disparities in Uzbek education: A regional analysis. Central Asian Journal of Education, 8(1), 22–37.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74.
Hillmayr, D., Ziernwald, L., Reinhold, F., Hofer, S. I., & Reiss, K. M. (2020). The potential of digital tools to enhance mathematics and science learning in secondary schools: A context-specific meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 153, 103897.
Chi, M. T. H., Slotta, J. D., & de Leeuw, N. (1994). From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 27–43.
O'zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining PQ-152-son Qarori (2023). Matematika va STEM fanlarini o'qitishda innovatsion texnologiyalarni joriy etish chora-tadbirlari to'g'risida. Toshkent.
HolonIQ. (2024). Global intelligence report: AI in education market 2020–2026. HolonIQ Research.
UNESCO. (2024). Digital education outlook: Imagining the future of technology in education. UNESCO Publishing.
National Curriculum Framework of the Republic of Uzbekistan (2022). Ministry of Preschool and School Education. Tashkent.
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Rand McNally.
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Как цитировать
