PHONOCOGNITIVE ASPECTS OF ENGLISH AND UZBEKISTAN TONGUE TWISTERS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20520367Keywords:
tongue twisters, phonocognitive analysis, pronunciation, segment.Abstract
This thesis shows that it is a limited approach to consider the results of phonocognitive analysis of tongue twisters as a list of individual errors. Each error is due to a specific mechanism: a pre-activated segment, a lagging segment, an overly strong rhythmic pattern, an unexpected word boundary, or competition in the articulatory program.References
Acheson D. J., MacDonald M. C. Twisting tongues and memories: Explorations of the relationship between language production and verbal working memory // Journal of Memory and Language. — 2009. — Vol. 60, Issue 3. — P. 329–350. — DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2008.12.002.
Acheson D. J., Hagoort P. Twisting tongues to test for conflict-monitoring in speech production // Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. — 2014. — Vol. 8. — Art. 206. — DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00206.
Baddeley A. D., Hitch G. J. Working memory // The Psychology of Learning and Motivation. — New York: Academic Press, 1974. — Vol. 8. — P. 47–89; Baddeley A. Working Memory. — Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.
Dell G. S. A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production // Psychological Review. — 1986. — Vol. 93, № 3. — P. 283–321. — DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283.
Levelt W. J. M. Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. — Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1989.
Wilshire C. E. The “Tongue Twister” Paradigm as a Technique for Studying Phonological Encoding // Language and Speech. — 1999. — Vol. 42, № 1. — P. 57–82. — DOI: 10.1177/00238309990420010301.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Innovative Academy RSC
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
