Articles

RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY AFTER MASTECTOMY FOR BREAST CANCER

Vol. 6 No. 5 Part 2 (2026) 48-54

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20380087 2026-05-25 Articles Open Access

Authors

  • Турдымуратов Русланбек Еркебаевич Студент Ташкентский государственный медицинсий университет Узбекистан, г. Ташкент
  • Нишонова Юлдуз Хатамовна Phd, Доцент Ташкентский государственный медицинсий университет Узбекистан, г. Ташкент

Abstract

Breast cancer occupies a leading position in the structure of oncological morbidity among women worldwide. Mastectomy, as a radical method of surgical treatment, is often accompanied by significant physical and psychological consequences, which determines the relevance of reconstructive interventions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of modern breast reconstruction methods after mastectomy and to analyze their impact on patients’ quality of life. A retrospective study included 120 patients who underwent mastectomy during the period from 2021 to 2025. The main reconstruction methods were analyzed: implant-based, autologous, and combined reconstruction. It was established that the choice of reconstruction method significantly affects functional and aesthetic outcomes, as well as patients’ quality of life. Immediate reconstruction using silicone implants and autologous tissues provides the best long-term outcomes with appropriate patient selection. The improvement of reconstructive technologies in oncoplastic surgery contributes to reducing psychological trauma and improving the social rehabilitation of women who have undergone breast cancer treatment.

Keywords:

References

Ferlay J., Ervik M., Lam F., et al. Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today. Lyon: IARC; 2022. Available at: https://gco.iarc.fr/

Jagsi R., Jiang J., Momoh A.O., et al. Complications after mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for breast cancer: a claims-based analysis. Ann Surg. 2016;263(2):219–227.

National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). Breast Cancer Guidelines. Version 2. 2024.

Nahabedian M.Y., Cocilovo C. Two-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction: a comparison between prepectoral and subpectoral techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(6S):22S–30S.

Pusic A.L., Klassen A.F., Scott A.M., et al. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(2):345–353.

Cardoso F., Paluch-Shimon S., Senkus E., et al. 5th ESO-ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 5). Ann Oncol. 2020;31(12):1623–1649.

Sigalove S., Maxwell G.P., Sigalove N.M., et al. Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: rationale, indications, and preliminary results. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(2):287–294.

World Health Organization. Breast Cancer Fact Sheet. Geneva: WHO; 2023.

Readership

3 Views
0 PDF downloads
2 Countries

    Downloads

    Published

    2026-05-25

    Issue

    Section

    Articles

    How to Cite

    Турдымуратов , Р., & Нишонова , Ю. (2026). RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY AFTER MASTECTOMY FOR BREAST CANCER. Eurasian Journal of Medical and Natural Sciences, 6(5 Part 2), 48-54. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20380087
    Innovative Academy RSC
    Article metrics Views and PDF downloads
    3 Views
    0 Downloads