IMPROVING PROCEDURAL MECHANISMS FOR CHECKING THE ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE BY THE INVESTIGATIVE JUDGE AT THE PRE-TRIAL STAGE
Keywords:
Investigative judge, admissibility of evidence, inadmissible evidence, judicial control, Criminal Procedure Code, French experience, torture, procedural filter.Abstract
The thesis analyzes the role of the newly introduced institution of the investigative judge in verifying the admissibility of evidence in criminal proceedings. The author identifies the lack of a mechanism for “filtering” illegally obtained evidence at the pre-trial stage as a primary issue. Based on the experiences of France and Italy, and the views of international scholars (M. Damaška, M. Delmas-Marty), it is proposed to grant the investigative judge the authority to declare evidence inadmissible by amending Articles 95-1 and 405-11 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
References
O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Jinoyat-protsessual kodeksi. 01.04.1995-yil. https://lex.uz/docs/-111460
“Dalillar maqbulligiga oid jinoyat-protsessual qonuni normalarini qoʻllashning ayrim masalalari toʻgʻrisida”gi Oliy Sud Plenumi qarori. https://lex.uz/uz/docs/-3895986
Fransiya jinoyat protsessual kodeksi. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/section_lc/legitext000006071154/legiscta000006151893/
Italiya jinoyat protsessual kodeksi. https://www.altalex.com/documents/codici-altalex/2014/10/30/codice-di-procedura-penale
Delmas-Marty M. The European Convention on Human Rights... Cambridge University Press.
Damaška, M. R. (1986). The Faces of Justice and State Authority: A Comparative Approach to the Legal Process. Yale University Press
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
