Статьи

THE FORMATION OF THE CONCEPT OF DISCOURSE MARKERS AND THE PROBLEM OF TERMINOLOGICAL DIVERSITY: A COMPARATIVE VIEW OF ENGLISH AND UZBEK LINGUISTICS

Том 4 № 8 (2026): Центральноазиатский журнал академических исследований 249-255

2026-08-31 Статьи CC BY 4.0 Open Access

Авторы

  • Islomova Yulduz Baxtiyor qizi

Аннотация

The article traces the formation of the concept of the discourse marker in English linguistics and analyses the problem of terminological diversity in labelling these units. Metalinguistic terms used in English and Uzbek linguistics are compared, and it is argued that in Uzbek linguistics such units are not described as a unified functional class but are distributed across morphological categories. A standardised terminological apparatus and four operational identification criteria are proposed. 

Ключевые слова:

Библиографические ссылки

Aijmer, K. (2002). English discourse particles: Evidence from a corpus. John Benjamins.

Aijmer, K. (2013). Understanding pragmatic markers: A variational pragmatic approach. Edinburgh University Press.

Aijmer, K., & Simon-Vandenbergen, A.-M. (Eds.). (2006). Pragmatic markers in contrast. Elsevier.

Beeching, K. (2016). Pragmatic markers in British English: Meaning in social interaction. Cambridge University Press.

Blakemore, D. (1987). Semantic constraints on relevance. Blackwell.

Blakemore, D. (2002). Relevance and linguistic meaning: The semantics and pragmatics of discourse markers. Cambridge University Press.

Brinton, L. J. (1996). Pragmatic markers in English: Grammaticalization and discourse functions. Mouton de Gruyter.

Crible, L. (2018). Discourse markers and (dis)fluency: Forms and functions across languages and registers. John Benjamins.

Fischer, K. (Ed.). (2006). Approaches to discourse particles. Elsevier.

Fraser, B. (1999). What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics, 31(7), 931–952.

Fraser, B. (2009). An account of discourse markers. International Review of Pragmatics, 1(2), 293–320.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman.

Heine, B. (2013). On discourse markers: Grammaticalization, pragmaticalization, or something else? Linguistics, 51(6), 1205–1247.

Islomova, Ch. B. (2025a). The impact of early second language learning on the native language: A comparative study of English and Uzbek. Modern Scientific Research International Scientific Journal, 3(8), 38–43.

Islomova, Ch. B. (2025b). Early second language learning and academic achievement: The experience of Uzbekistan’s education system. American Journal of Modern World Sciences, 2(8), 65–73.

Islomova, Ch. B. (2025c). Speech acts of request: English and Uzbek comparison. In Conference of Innovative Horizons in Science & Engineering (pp. 147–152).

Islomova, Ch. B. (2025d). Politeness in English and Uzbek: How people say please and thank you. In Conference of Advance Science & Emerging Technologies (pp. 237–240).

Jucker, A. H., & Ziv, Y. (Eds.). (1998). Discourse markers: Descriptions and theory. John Benjamins.

Kaltenböck, G., Heine, B., & Kuteva, T. (2011). On thetical grammar. Studies in Language, 35(4), 852–897.

Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge University Press.

Schourup, L. (1999). Discourse markers. Lingua, 107(3–4), 227–265.

Traugott, E. C. (1995). The role of the development of discourse markers in a theory of grammaticalization [Paper presentation]. ICHL XII, Manchester, United Kingdom.

География читателей

8 Просмотры
0 Загрузки PDF
7 Стран

    Опубликован

    2026-08-31

    Как цитировать

    Islomova , Y. (2026). THE FORMATION OF THE CONCEPT OF DISCOURSE MARKERS AND THE PROBLEM OF TERMINOLOGICAL DIVERSITY: A COMPARATIVE VIEW OF ENGLISH AND UZBEK LINGUISTICS. Центральноазиатский журнал академических исследований, 4(8), 249-255. https://www.in-academy.uz/index.php/CAJAR/article/view/56665
    Innovative Academy RSC
    Article metrics Views and PDF downloads
    6 Views
    0 Downloads