LEGAL CONDITIONS FOR THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF DIPLOMATIC AND CONSULAR PROTECTION
Ключевые слова:
diplomatic protection, consular protection, nationality, exhaustion of local remedies, international law, ILC, state responsibility.Аннотация
This article examines the legal conditions governing the exercise of the right of diplomatic and consular protection under contemporary international law. The study draws on international conventions, decisions of international judicial bodies, scholarly doctrine, and state practice. In this work, it was analyzed the key preconditions – nationality of claims, exhaustion of local remedies, and the conduct of the injured person, through the lens of the IRAC (Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) methodology. Particular attention is paid to the interrelationship between diplomatic and consular protection and their mutual delimitation. The article concludes that despite the codification of relevant norms in the ILC Draft Articles of 2006, a number of fundamental questions remain debatable, necessitating further development of international legal regulation.
Библиографические ссылки
Emer de Vattel, Le droit des gens ou Principes de la loi naturelle (1758), Book II, Ch. VI, § 71.
Edwin Borchard, The Diplomatic Protection of Citizens Abroad (1915), p. 29.
ILC Draft Articles on Diplomatic Protection with Commentaries, Report of the ILC, 58th Session, UN Doc. A/61/10 (2006).
PCIJ, Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions (Jurisdiction), Judgment of 30 August 1924, PCIJ Series A, No. 2, p. 12.
Chittharanjan F. Amerasinghe, Diplomatic Protection (Oxford University Press, 2008).
John Dugard, First Report on Diplomatic Protection, ILC, 52nd Session, UN Doc. A/CN.4/506 (2000).
Annemarieke Vermeer-Künzli, The Protection of Individuals by Means of Diplomatic Protection: Diplomatic Protection as a Human Rights Instrument (PhD dissertation, Leiden University, 2007).
Christian Amerasinghe, 'Reflections on the Barcelona Traction Case' (1971) 65 American Journal of International Law.
Eileen Denza, Diplomatic Law: Commentary on the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (4th ed., Oxford University Press, 2016).
ILC Draft Articles on Diplomatic Protection (2006), Art. 1.
Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961), Art. 3(1)(b).
Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (1963), Arts. 5(a), 36.
ICJ, LaGrand (Germany v. United States of America), Judgment of 27 June 2001, ICJ Reports 2001, p. 466.
ICJ, Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (Belgium v. Spain), Judgment of 5 February 1970, ICJ Reports 1970, p. 3.
Borchard (n 2), pp. 186–190.
ICJ, Interhandel (Switzerland v. United States of America), Preliminary Objections, Judgment of 21 March 1959, ICJ Reports 1959, p. 6.
PCIJ, The Panevezys-Saldutiskis Railway Case (Estonia v. Lithuania), Judgment of 28 February 1939, PCIJ Series A/B, No. 76, p. 18.
ILC Draft Articles on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts (2001), Art. 39.
Amerasinghe (n 5), pp. 98–101.
ICJ, Avena and Other Mexican Nationals (Mexico v. United States of America), Judgment of 31 March 2004, ICJ Reports 2004, p. 12.
Karl Doehring, 'Aliens, Admission' in R. Bernhardt (ed.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law (1992), vol. I.
Vermeer-Künzli (n 7), pp. 210–230.
ICJ, Elettronica Sicula S.p.A. (ELSI) (United States of America v. Italy), Judgment of 20 July 1989, ICJ Reports 1989, p. 15.
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Как цитировать
