XORIJIY TAJRIBALAR ASOSIDA MUHANDISLARNI BARQAROR TRANSPORT TIZIMLARINI LOYIHALASHGA TAYYORLASHNING QIYOSIY TAHLILI
Ключевые слова:
barqaror transport, muhandislik ta’limi, xorijiy tajriba, qiyosiy tahlil, CDIO, ABET, loyiha asosida o‘qitish, raqamli modellashtirish, barqaror mobillik.Аннотация
Ushbu maqolada xorijiy tajribalar asosida muhandislarni barqaror transport tizimlarini loyihalashga tayyorlash jarayoni qiyosiy-pedagogik nuqtayi nazardan tahlil qilinadi. Zamonaviy muhandislik ta’limida barqaror transport tizimlarini loyihalash kompetentligini shakllantirish texnik bilimlar, ekologik mas’uliyat, raqamli modellashtirish, tizimli tahlil, iqtisodiy asoslash va ijtimoiy qulaylikni birlashtiruvchi murakkab ta’limiy jarayon sifatida qaralmoqda. Maqolada AQSh, Yevropa Ittifoqi, Skandinaviya mamlakatlari, Yaponiya, Singapur va Janubiy Koreya tajribalarida kompetensiyaviy yondashuv, CDIO modeli, ABET akkreditatsiya talablari, loyiha asosida o‘qitish, aqlli transport texnologiyalari, yashil mobillik va fanlararo integratsiya tamoyillarining qo‘llanishi tahlil qilinadi. Xorijiy tajribalar shuni ko‘rsatadiki, bo‘lajak muhandislarni barqaror transport loyihalashga tayyorlash samaradorligi ta’lim mazmunining real transport muammolari bilan bog‘lanishi, raqamli vositalarning amaliy qo‘llanilishi, ekologik va ijtimoiy mezonlarning loyiha topshiriqlariga integratsiyalashuvi hamda kompetensiyaga asoslangan baholash tizimi bilan belgilanadi.
Библиографические ссылки
ABET. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2025–2026. — Baltimore: ABET, 2025. — URL: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2025-2026/
CDIO Initiative. The CDIO Syllabus. — URL: https://www.cdio.org/framework-benefits/cdio-syllabus
Crawley E. F., Malmqvist J., Östlund S., Brodeur D. R., Edström K. Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach. — 2nd ed. — Cham: Springer, 2014. — 311 p.
Dym C. L., Agogino A. M., Eris O., Frey D. D., Leifer L. J. Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning // Journal of Engineering Education. — 2005. — Vol. 94, № 1. — P. 103–120.
Felder R. M., Silverman L. K. Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education // Engineering Education. — 1988. — Vol. 78, № 7. — P. 674–681.
Prince M. J., Felder R. M. Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases // Journal of Engineering Education. — 2006. — Vol. 95, № 2. — P. 123–138.
Mills J. E., Treagust D. F. Engineering Education — Is Problem-Based or Project-Based Learning the Answer? // Australasian Journal of Engineering Education. — 2003. — Vol. 3, № 2. — P. 2–16.
Banister D. The Sustainable Mobility Paradigm // Transport Policy. — 2008. — Vol. 15, № 2. — P. 73–80.
Black W. R. Sustainable Transportation: Problems and Solutions. — New York: Guilford Press, 2010. — 299 p.
Schiller P. L., Bruun E. C., Kenworthy J. R. An Introduction to Sustainable Transportation: Policy, Planning and Implementation. — London: Earthscan, 2010. — 352 p.
European Commission. Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy: Putting European Transport on Track for the Future. — Brussels: European Commission, 2020. — COM(2020) 789 final.
European Commission. Mobility Strategy: Sustainable and Smart Mobility. — URL: https://transport.ec.europa.eu/transport-themes/mobility-strategy_en
International Transport Forum. ITF Transport Outlook 2023. — Paris: OECD Publishing, 2023. — 250 p.
United Nations. Sustainable Transport, Sustainable Development: Interagency Report for the Second Global Sustainable Transport Conference. — New York: United Nations, 2021. — 139 p.
World Bank. Global Mobility Report 2017: Tracking Sector Performance. — Washington, DC: World Bank, 2017. — 220 p.
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Как цитировать
