THE SIGNIFICANCE AND CONTRIBUTION OF US ALLIES OUTSIDE NATO IN DEVELOPING THE SYSTEM OF SAN FRANCISCO
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Аннотация:
This article discusses the reasons why US position in the Asia-Pacific region weakened, the main goals of American policy in the Asia-Pacific region, framework of the status of "the main non-NATO ally". The article also discusses how the end of the Cold War turned the United States into the only superpower and its consequences on the system of international relations.
Article Details
Как цитировать:
Библиографические ссылки:
Pilko A.V. "Crisis of trust" in NATO: the Alliance on the threshold of change (1956—1966). Moscow: Publishing House of Moscow. un-ta, 2007. 240 p.
Baruch K, Migdal J., Palestinians: The Making of a People, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994. 568 p.
49. Bierstaker T., Weber S. (eds.) State Sovereignty as Social Construct. Cambridge University Press, 1996. 316 p.
Carpenter T. A. Search for Enemies: America's Alliances After the Cold War. Cato Institute, 1992. 238 p.
Dower J. W. War without Mercy: Race and Power in the Pacific War. New York: Pantheon, 1986. 399 p.
Sharp, J. M., Egypt: Background and US Relations, Congressional Research Service (CRS) Report for Congress RL33003 (US Congress, CRS: Washington, DC, 7 Jun. 2018), pp. 19–24.
Fact Sheet: The U.S.–Afghanistan Strategic Partnership Agreement [Electronic resource] // The White House [Official website]. May 1, 2012. URL: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/05/01/fact-sheet-usafghanistan-strategic-partnership-agreement
Presidential Memorandum Regarding Withdrawal of the United States from the Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiations and Agreement [Electronic resource] //The White House [Official website]. URL: https://www.whitehouse.gov/thepress-office/2017/01/23/presidential-memorandum-regarding-withdrawalunited-states-trans-pacific