Maqolalar

PECULARITIES OF METAPHOR AND GENDER IN PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS

Jild 5 son 21 (2026) 110-113

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21019450 2026-06-29 Maqolalar Open Access

Mualliflar

  • Nazarova Zebiniso Ravshanjon qizi Teacher at Kokand State University

Annotatsiya

This paper explores the interplay between gender concepts and metaphorical expressions in phraseological units across different languages. It examines how societal perceptions of masculinity and femininity are encoded through metaphors in idioms, proverbs, and set phrases. Special attention is given to how gender roles, stereotypes, and cultural values are reflected and reinforced in metaphorical language. Through comparative analysis, the study highlights differences and similarities in gendered metaphor usage in English, Russian, and Uzbek phraseological systems. The findings reveal that metaphorical representations of gender are deeply rooted in cultural consciousness, shaping and reflecting collective attitudes toward men and women. Understanding these patterns contributes to a deeper comprehension of both language structure and cultural ideology.

Kalit soʻzlar:

Iqtiboslar

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Longman.

Gudykunst, W. B., & Ting-Toomey, S. (1988). Culture and Interpersonal Communication. Sage.

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. Sage.

Holmes, J. (2008). Gendered Talk at Work: Constructing Gender Identity Through Workplace Discourse. Wiley-Blackwell.

Jones, L., & Holmes, J. (2011). Discourse in Society: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Routledge.

Krook, M. L. (2020). Violence Against Women in Politics. Oxford University Press.

Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and Woman’s Place. Harper & Row.

Tannen, D. (1990). You Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. Morrow.

Cameron, D. (2003). Feminism and Linguistic Theory. Palgrave Macmillan.

Mills, S. (2003). Gender and Politeness. Cambridge University Press.

Sunderland, J. (2006). Language and Gender: An Advanced Resource Book. Routledge.

Talbot, M. (2010). Language and Gender. Polity.

Wodak, R. (1997). Gender and Discourse. Sage.

Coates, J. (2015). Women, Men and Language: A Sociolinguistic Account of Gender Differences in Language. Routledge.

Cameron, D. (2007). The Myth of Mars and Venus: Do Men and Women Really Speak Differently? Oxford University Press.

Weatherall, A. (2002). Gender, Language, and Discourse. Routledge.

Litosseliti, L. (2006). Gender and Language: Theory and Practice. Routledge.

Spender, D. (1980). Man Made Language. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Baxter, J. (2018). Women Leaders and Gender Stereotyping in the UK Press: A Postfeminist Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan.

McConnell-Ginet, S. (2011). Gender, Sexuality, and Meaning: Linguistic Practice and Politics. Oxford University Press.

Yuklab olishlar

Nashr qilingan

2026-06-29

Son

Boʻlim

Maqolalar

Iqtibos keltirish tartibi

Nazarova, Z. (2026). PECULARITIES OF METAPHOR AND GENDER IN PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS. Zamonaviy Dunyoda Innovatsion Tadqiqotlar, 5(21), 110-113. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21019450
Innovative Academy RSC
Article metrics Views and PDF downloads
4 Views
0 Downloads