SOCIOLINGUISTICS THROUGH COMMUNICATIVE, CRITICAL, AND REFLECTIVE APPROACHES IN THE TEACHING CONTEXT
;
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20427172;
language, students, their, teaching, learnersAbstrak
This article focuses on effective methods and approaches for teaching sociolinguistics to target learners in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) contexts. Learners often face difficulties with sociolinguistic elements such as accurate pronunciation, dialects, accents, language and identity, language and power, politeness, formality, multilingualism, and cultural diversity. This can foster communicative competence and sociocultural awareness. The article analyses the integration of communicative and pronunciation-focused methodologies in the field of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) and the Audiolingual Method (ALM), to address diverse language needs and learning preferences. The research paper carries out the importance of critical and reflective pedagogical approaches that prompt students to practice language as a social phenomenon linked to culture, identity, and power relations. Interactive classroom activities as role-plays, debates, discussions, reflective writing, and technology-enhanced activities, are effective strategies for promoting learner engagement and developing communication, critical thinking, and self-evaluation skills. The article discusses the importance of teaching language features such as register, dialect variation, intonation, and nonverbal communication to enhance learners’ ability to use language appropriately in varied social contexts.Iqtiboslar
Brown, L. (2013). “Oppa, Hold My Purse:” A Sociocultural Study of Identity and Indexicality in the Perception and Use of Oppa'Older Brother'by Second Language Learners. Korean Language in America, 18(1), 1-22.
Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D., & Snow, A. (2014). Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Heinle ELT.
Gregersen, T. S. (2007). Language learning beyond words: Incorporating body language into classroom activities. Reflections on English language teaching, 6(1), 51-64.
Hawkins, M., & Norton, B. (2009). Critical language teacher education. Cambridge guide to second language teacher education, 30.
Ishihara, N., & Cohen, A. D. (2010). Teaching and learning pragmatics. Pearson Education UK.
Kessler, G. (2018). Technology and the future of language teaching. Foreign Language Annuals, 51(1), 205-218.
Levis, J. M. (1999). Intonation in theory and practice, revisited. TESOL Quarterly, 33(1), 37-63. Lightbown, P. M., & Han, Z. (2008). Transfer appropriate processing as a model for classroom second language acquisition. Understanding Second Language Process, 27, 44.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Savignon, S. J. (2018). Communicative competence. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1-7.
Savignon, S. J. (1991). Communicative language teaching: State of the art. TESOL Quarterly, 25(2), 261-278.
##submission.downloads##
Nashr qilingan
Nashr
Bo'lim
Litsenziya
##submission.copyrightStatement##
##submission.license.cc.by4.footer##Iqtibos keltirish tartibi