SUDLANUVCHINING ADOLATLI SUD MUHOKAMASIGA BO‘LGAN HUQUQINI HIMOYA QILISHNING XALQARO-HUQUQIY STANDARTLARI
;
Inson huquqlari, odil sudlov, aybsizlik prezumpsiyasi, himoya huquqi, habeas corpus, xalqaro huquqiy standartlar, sudlanuvchi huquqlari, jinoyat protsessi, Rim statuti, xalqaro sud amaliyoti.Abstrak
Mazkur maqolada sudlanuvchining odil sudlovga bo‘lgan huquqi va uni ta’minlashning xalqaro-huquqiy standartlari tahlil qilinadi. Xususan, inson huquqlari umumjahon deklaratsiyasi, fuqarolik va siyosiy huquqlar to‘g‘risidagi xalqaro pakt, Yevropa inson huquqlari konvensiyasi hamda Rim statuti doirasida belgilangan asosiy protsessual kafolatlar yoritilgan. Aybsizlik prezumpsiyasi, himoya huquqi, adolatli sud muhokamasi, habeas corpus prinsipi kabi muhim institutlarning mazmuni ochib berilgan. Shuningdek, xalqaro sud amaliyoti misolida mazkur tamoyillarning qo‘llanishi tahlil qilingan. Maqolada sudlanuvchi huquqlarini ta’minlashning milliy va xalqaro huquq tizimidagi o‘rni va ahamiyati asoslab beriladi.
Iqtiboslar
Usmonov M.B., Qo’shayev N.M. Insonning umumiy konstitutsiyaviy huquq va erkinliklari. Risola. – Toshkent: O’zbekiston Respublikasi Jamoat xavfsizligi universiteti, 2023.
https://isrs.uz/oz/content/undefined/post/947
Михайловская И. Права личности — новый прио ритет Уголовно-процессуального кодекса Российской Федерации // Российская юстиция. 2002. № 7. С. 2. https://base.garant.ru/5112926/
Ибрагимова С.Э. Международные принципы за щиты прав человека и уголовно-процессуальное законодательство Республики Узбекистан // Вест ник Юридического факультета Южного федераль ного университета. 2019. Т. 6. № 4. С. 58–63. DOI: 10.23683/2313-6138-2019-6-4-10.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights https://lex.uz/uz/docs/-7338189
European Convention of Human Rights https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBV0001000/2021-08-01
CASE OF ALLENET DE RIBEMONT v. FRANCE (Application no. 15175/89) STRASBOURG 10 February 1995 https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/?i=001-57914
UN Human Rights Committee (HRC), General comment no. 32, Article 14, Right to equality before courts and tribunals and to a fair trial, 23 August 2007, CCPR/C/GC/32, para. 30. URL: https://undocs.org/CCPR/C/GC/32
UN Human Rights Committee (HRC), Gridin v. Russian Federation, Communication No. 770/1997, UN Doc. CCPR/C/69/D/770/1997 (2000), para. 8.2.https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CCPR/C/69/D/770/1997
UN Human Rights Committee (HRC), Gridin v. Russian Federation, Communication No. 770/1997, UN Doc. CCPR/C/69/D/770/1997 (2000), para. 8.2.https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CCPR/C/69/D/770/1997
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights
United Nations. Principles and Guidelines on Access to Legal Aid in Criminal Justice Systems. UN General Assembly Resolution 67/187, 20 December 2012. https://www.unodc.org/documents/justice-and-prison-reform/UN_principles_and_guidlines_on_access_to_legal_aid.pdf
“Xabeas korpus” va “Miranda qoidasi” – inson huquqi ta’minlanishining Konstitutsiyadagi yaqqol aksi “Xabeas korpus” va “Miranda qoidasi” haqida nimalar bilamiz? https://uza.uz/uz/posts/habeas-korpus-va-miranda-qoidasi-inson-huquqi-taminlanishining-konstituciyadagi-yaqqol-aksi-habeas-korpus-va-miranda-qoidasi-haqida-nimalar-bilamiz_469447
Sharpe R.J. The law of Habeas Corpus. Oxford, 1976.
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/2024-05/Rome-Statute-eng.pdf
