INTEGRATING AI FEEDBACK LOOPS IN ACADEMIC READING INSTRUCTION: PEDAGOGICAL OPPORTUNITIES AND ETHICAL CHALLENGES

Main Article Content

Аннотация:

This article examines the integration of AI feedback loops into academic reading instruction, highlighting both their pedagogical benefits and ethical implications. As intelligent systems increasingly assist learners through adaptive feedback, summarization, and comprehension analysis, educators face new opportunities to enhance reading engagement, self-regulation, and critical awareness. The study investigates how AI-generated feedback—delivered through tools such as ChatGPT, Elicit, and Perplexity—can promote metacognitive reflection, formative assessment, and individualized reading support. Drawing upon socio-constructivist and feedback literacy frameworks, the research emphasizes the role of iterative AI-human interaction in fostering deeper textual comprehension. However, it also addresses ethical concerns such as data privacy, algorithmic bias, intellectual dependency, and the diminishing of authentic interpretive skills. Findings suggest that AI feedback loops, when thoughtfully embedded within pedagogically guided environments, can enhance learner autonomy, motivation, and comprehension outcomes. The paper concludes with recommendations for balancing technological innovation with ethical responsibility, proposing a reflective model for educators to critically evaluate AI’s role in academic literacy development.

Article Details

Как цитировать:

Adhamova, N. (2025). INTEGRATING AI FEEDBACK LOOPS IN ACADEMIC READING INSTRUCTION: PEDAGOGICAL OPPORTUNITIES AND ETHICAL CHALLENGES. Наука и технология в современном мире, 4(28), 52–57. извлечено от https://www.in-academy.uz/index.php/zdift/article/view/64099

Библиографические ссылки:

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson Education. https://www.pearson.com/content/dam/corporate/global/pearson-dot-com/files/innovation/Intelligence-Unleashed-Publication.pdf

Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. NYU Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479833641.001.0001

Noddings, N. (2013). Caring: A relational approach to ethics and moral education (2nd ed.). University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520957343

RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1465.html

Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153-189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795

Williamson, B. (2017). Decoding ClassDojo: Psycho-policy, social-emotional learning and persuasive educational technologies. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(4), 440-453. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2017.1278020