PRODUCTIVE WORD FORMATION PATTERNS IN MODERN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20570393Keywords:
word formation, morphology, affixation, compounding, English language, Uzbek language, vocabulary development.Abstract
This article examines productive word formation patterns in modern English and Uzbek languages from a comparative perspective. Word formation is one of the most important mechanisms for vocabulary expansion and linguistic development. The study analyzes the most productive processes, including affixation, compounding, abbreviation, and borrowing, and identifies similarities and differences between the two languages. The research is based on descriptive and comparative methods. The findings reveal that affixation remains the dominant word formation process in both languages, although Uzbek relies more heavily on suffixation due to its agglutinative structure, while English demonstrates a greater variety of derivational patterns. The study contributes to comparative linguistics and language teaching by providing a clearer understanding of vocabulary development in English and Uzbek.References
Bauer, L. English Word-Formation. Cambridge University Press, 1983.
Plag, I. Word-Formation in English. Cambridge University Press, 2018.
Yule, G. The Study of Language. 7th ed. Cambridge University Press, 2020.
Crystal, D. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge University Press, 2019.
Hojiyev, A. O‘zbek Tili Morfologiyasi. Tashkent: O‘qituvchi, 2010.
Mahmudov, N. O‘zbek Tilining Nazariy Grammatikasi. Tashkent: Fan, 2018.
Mirtojiyev, M. Hozirgi O‘zbek Adabiy Tili. Tashkent: O‘zbekiston, 2017.
Katamba, F. Morphology. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019.
Downloads
Published
2026-06-06
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Innovative Academy RSC

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Xudoyberdiyeva, G. (2026). PRODUCTIVE WORD FORMATION PATTERNS IN MODERN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES. Science and Innovation, 4(54), 36-38. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20570393
Article metrics
Views and PDF downloads
0
Views
0
Downloads