THE SHADOW ECONOMY'S IMPACT ON TAX CAPACITY AND BUDGET SYSTEMS: QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS

Authors

  • Atajanov Kadambay Sapayevich Assistant Lecturer, Tashkent State University of Economics, Tashkent, Uzbekistan Independent Researcher affiliated with Urgench State University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20292228

Keywords:

shadow economy, tax capacity, tax gap, fiscal sustainability, fiscal policy, tax administration, informal sector, budget deficit, Uzbekistan, GMM

Abstract

This study provides a comprehensive assessment of the shadow economy's role in eroding tax capacity and its quantitative impact on fiscal system stability. Official data from Uzbekistan's Tax Committee, Ministry of Finance, and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) covering 2010–2023, as well as the World Bank panel dataset encompassing 42 developing countries, were utilized. The tax gap methodology and dynamic panel GMM (Generalized Method of Moments) approach were applied. The key findings indicate that in 2023, the shadow economy in Uzbekistan eliminated potential tax revenue equivalent to 31.4% of budget revenues, amounting to 68.7 trillion soums per year, or approximately USD 6.2 billion. It was also empirically demonstrated that a 1 percentage point increase in the shadow economy expands the budget deficit by 0.34 percentage points. The proposed three-dimensional policy package — improving tax administration efficiency, expanding social protection coverage in the informal sector, and ensuring fiscal transparency — has the potential to attract additional resources to the budget.

References

Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968

Bird, R. M., & Martinez-Vasquez, J. (2014). Sustainable development requires a good tax system. Andrew Young School of Policy Studies Research Paper Series, No. 14-08. Atlanta: Georgia State University.

Cobham, A., & Janský, P. (2018). Global distribution of revenue loss from corporate tax avoidance: Re-estimation and country results. Journal of International Development, 30(2), 206–232.

Dabla-Norris, E., Koeda, J., & Nozaki, M. (2019). Informality and fiscal policy in fragile states. IMF Working Paper WP/19/75. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.

Elgin, C., Kose, M. A., Ohnsorge, F., & Yu, S. (2021). Understanding informality. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 16497. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.

IMF. (2023). Fiscal Monitor: On the Path to Policy Normalization. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.

Isakova, A., Plekhanov, A., & Zettelmeyer, J. (2016). Managing Uzbekistan's transition to a market economy. EBRD Working Paper No. 183. London: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.

Keen, M., & Lockwood, B. (2010). The value added tax: Its causes and consequences. Journal of Development Economics, 92(2), 138–151.

Levin, J., & Widell, L. M. (2014). Tax evasion in Kenya and Tanzania: Evidence from missing imports. Economic Modelling, 39, 151–162.

Medina, L., & Schneider, F. (2019). Shedding light on the shadow economy: A global database and the interaction with the official one. CESifo Working Paper No. 7981. Munich: CESifo Institute.

Mirkasimov, B. (2022). Digital tax administration and the informal sector: Uzbekistan's experience. Uzbek Economic Review, 14(1), 62–84.

Nguyen, T. T., & Tran, Q. T. (2021). Shadow economy, corruption and fiscal sustainability in developing countries. Journal of Policy Modeling, 43(5), 1098–1113.

OECD. (2021). Tax Administration 3.0: The Digital Transformation of Tax Administration. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/6a71e72e-en

Republic of Uzbekistan Ministry of Finance. (2024). Report on the execution of the state budget for 2023. Tashkent: Ministry of Finance.

Republic of Uzbekistan Tax Committee. (2024). Annual administrative report 2023. Tashkent: Tax Committee.

Statistics Committee of the Republic of Uzbekistan (UzStat). (2024). Economic and social indicators of Uzbekistan 2023. Tashkent: UzStat.

Schneider, F., & Enste, D. H. (2000). Shadow economies: Size, causes, and consequences. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(1), 77–114.

Torgler, B., & Schneider, F. (2009). The impact of tax morale and institutional quality on the shadow economy. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(2), 228–245.

World Bank. (2011). Georgia: Governance Reform over the Rose Revolution. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/2813

World Bank. (2024). World Development Indicators 2024 [Database]. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Open Data. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators

Downloads

Published

2026-05-20

How to Cite

Atajanov, K. (2026). THE SHADOW ECONOMY’S IMPACT ON TAX CAPACITY AND BUDGET SYSTEMS: QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS. Science and Innovation, 4(41), 109-117. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20292228
Innovative Academy RSC
Article metrics Views and PDF downloads
1 Views
0 Downloads