BO‘LAJAK MUHANDISLARNING LOYIHALASH KOMPETENTLIGINI SHAKLLANTIRISHNING PEDAGOGIK VA METODOLOGIK ASOSLARI
;
bo‘lajak muhandis, loyihalash kompetentligi, muhandislik ta’limi, kompetensiyaviy yondashuv, metodologik asos, loyiha asosida o‘qitish, kasbiy tayyorgarlik, texnik tafakkur.Abstrak
Ushbu maqolada bo‘lajak muhandislarning loyihalash kompetentligini shakllantirishning pedagogik va metodologik asoslari tahlil qilinadi. Muhandislik ta’limining zamonaviy bosqichida mutaxassisdan nafaqat tayyor texnik yechimlarni bajarish, balki murakkab ishlab chiqarish, transport, energetika, raqamli texnologiyalar va barqaror rivojlanish sharoitida mustaqil loyiha yaratish, texnik muammoni tizimli tahlil qilish, innovatsion yechim ishlab chiqish va uning samaradorligini asoslash kompetensiyalari talab etilmoqda. Shu nuqtayi nazardan, loyihalash kompetentligini shakllantirish muhandislik ta’limining markaziy vazifalaridan biri hisoblanadi. Maqolada loyihalash kompetentligining mazmuni, uning tarkibiy komponentlari, pedagogik shart-sharoitlari, metodologik yondashuvlari hamda ta’lim jarayonida rivojlantirish mexanizmlari ilmiy jihatdan asoslanadi. Tadqiqotda kompetensiyaviy, tizimli, faoliyatga yo‘naltirilgan, integrativ, muammoli va loyiha asosida o‘qitish yondashuvlari bo‘lajak muhandislarning kasbiy tayyorgarligini takomillashtirishning asosiy metodologik omillari sifatida talqin etiladi.
Iqtiboslar
Dewey J. Experience and Education. — New York: Macmillan, 1938. — 116 p.
Vygotsky L. S. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. — Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1978. — 159 p.
Kolb D. A. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. — Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1984. — 256 p.
Biggs J., Tang C. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. — 4th ed. — Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2011. — 418 p.
Felder R. M., Silverman L. K. Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education // Engineering Education. — 1988. — Vol. 78, № 7. — P. 674–681.
Crawley E. F., Malmqvist J., Östlund S., Brodeur D. R., Edström K. Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach. — 2nd ed. — Cham: Springer, 2014. — 311 p.
Prince M. J., Felder R. M. Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases // Journal of Engineering Education. — 2006. — Vol. 95, № 2. — P. 123–138.
Dym C. L., Agogino A. M., Eris O., Frey D. D., Leifer L. J. Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning // Journal of Engineering Education. — 2005. — Vol. 94, № 1. — P. 103–120.
Mills J. E., Treagust D. F. Engineering Education — Is Problem-Based or Project-Based Learning the Answer? // Australasian Journal of Engineering Education. — 2003. — Vol. 3, № 2. — P. 2–16.
Rugarcia A., Felder R. M., Woods D. R., Stice J. E. The Future of Engineering Education. I. A Vision for a New Century // Chemical Engineering Education. — 2000. — Vol. 34, № 1. — P. 16–25.
Беспалько В. П. Слагаемые педагогической технологии. — Москва: Педагогика, 1989. — 192 с.
Зеер Э. Ф. Психология профессионального образования. — Москва: Академия, 2013. — 416 с.
##submission.downloads##
Nashr qilingan
Nashr
Bo'lim
Iqtibos keltirish tartibi
