Articles

EVALUATING FOR MASTERY AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENTS SUPPORT COMPETENCY-BASED LEARNING

Vol. 4 No. 7 (Special Issue) (2024): Practical problems and solutions to the use of theoretical laws in the sciences of the 21st century 173-175

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14221155 2024-07-31 Articles CC BY 4.0 Open Access

Authors

  • Bakhrom Urolov Lecturer, Department of Foreign Language and Literature ,University of Tashkent for Applied Science,Tashkent,100000,Uzbekistan

Abstract

Traditional standardized testing focuses on rote memorization and low-level skills, failing to adequately evaluate if students have mastered higher-order competencies needed for post-secondary success. Competency-based education aims to develop mastery of key abilities through personalized, flexible learning. However, assessment practices must also shift to authentic tasks that mirror real-world applications. This article examines how authentic assessment supports competency-based learning goals. Authentic assessments embed evaluation within open-ended, complex projects, performances and problems set in contexts similar to work, community or post-secondary education. Through authentic tasks, students demonstrate mastery of collaboration, problem-solving, communication and other transferable skills. Feedback is ongoing to support continuous improvement. Research indicates authentic assessment is a valid measure of competency attainment. Data from three competency-based high schools that implemented portfolio-based, performance-based and product-based assessments show such tools reliably indicate students' mastery of collaboration, digital literacy and other targeted competencies. Authentic assessment also increases student engagement and motivation by connecting learning to meaningful work. This evidence suggests authentic assessment should be a core practice for any competency-based learning model seeking to fully evaluate student competency development.

Keywords:

References

Wiggins, G. (1990). The case for authentic assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.7275/qy68-9w73

Newmann, F. M., & Archbald, D. A. (1992). The nature of authentic academic achievement. In H. Berlak, F. M. Newmann, E. Adams, D. A. Archbald, T. Burgess, J. Raven, & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Toward a new science of educational testing and assessment (pp. 71–83). State University of New York Press.

Brand-Gruwel, S., Wopereis, I., & Vermetten, Y. (2005). Information problem solving by experts and novices: Analysis of a complex cognitive skill. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(3), 487–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.005

Tamaoka, K. (2013). Authentic assessment for problem-solving competence. English Language Teaching, 6(3), 1. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n3p1

Published

2024-07-31

How to Cite

Urolov, B. (2024). EVALUATING FOR MASTERY AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENTS SUPPORT COMPETENCY-BASED LEARNING. Eurasian Journal of Academic Research, 4(7 (Special Issue), 173-175. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14221155
Innovative Academy RSC
Article metrics Views and PDF downloads
1 Views
0 Downloads