SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF ZYGOMATIC IMPLANT SUCCESS RATES IN THE REHABILITATION OF SEVERELY ATROPHIC MAXILLAE
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Аннотация:
Zygomatic implants offer an effective treatment option for patients with severe maxillary atrophy, enabling the delivery of fixed prosthetics within 24 hours. Despite their widespread use, reported success rates vary across studies, leading to ongoing debate regarding their overall efficacy and predictability. This study aims to evaluate the published literature on the use of zygomatic implants for reconstructing the severely atrophic maxilla and to report the cumulative success rate (CSR) over various follow-up periods. A systematic review of 196 studies was conducted, revealing a CSR of 98.5% at less than 1 year, 97.5% at 1–3 years, 96.8% at 3–5 years, and 96.1% after 5 years or more. The most frequently reported complications were soft tissue dehiscence, rhinosinusitis, and prosthetic failures. These findings confirm that zygomatic implants are a reliable and safe solution for addressing severe maxillary bone deficiency, achieving a CSR of 96.1% over the long term.
Article Details
Как цитировать:
Библиографические ссылки:
Branemark P., Gröndahl K., Öhrnell L., Nilsson P., Petruson B., Svensson B., Engstrand P., Nannmark U. Zygoma Fixture in the Management of Advanced Atrophy of the Maxilla: Technique and Long-Term Results. Scand. J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Hand Surg. 2004;38:70–85. doi: 10.1080/02844310310023918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Chana H., Smith G., Bansal H., Zahra D.A. Chana, Harpal, Graham Smith, Harjot Bansal, and Daniel Zahra. A Retrospective Cohort Study of the Survival Rate of 88 Zygomatic Implants Placed Over an 18-Year Period. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2019;34:461–470. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Balan I., Di Girolamo M., Lauritano D., Carinci F. Treatment of severe atrophic maxilla with zygomatic implants: A case series. Oral Implantol. 2017;10:317–324. doi: 10.11138/orl/2017.10.3.317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Bedrossian E. Rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla with the zygoma concept: A 7-year prospective study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2010;25:1213–1221. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Esposito M., Davó R., Marti-Pages C., Ferrer-Fuertes A., Barausse C., Pistilli R., Ippolito D.R., Felice P. Immediately Loaded Zygomatic Implants vs Conventional Dental Implants in Augmented Atrophic Maxillae: 4 Months Post-Loading Results from a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial. [(accessed on 1 July 2022)];Eur. J. Oral Implantol. 2018 11:11–28. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29557398. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Aparicio C., Manresa C., Francisco K., Claros P., Alández J., González-Martín O., Albrektsson T. Zygomatic Implants: Indications, Techniques and Outcomes, and the Zygomatic Success Code. Periodontology. 2000;66:41–58. doi: 10.1111/prd.12038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Bedrossian E., Stumpel L., Beckely M.L., Indresano T. The zygomatic implant: Preliminary data on treatment of severely resorbed maxillae. A clinical report. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2002;17:861–865. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Aparicio C., López-Piriz R., Albrektsson T. ORIS Criteria of Success for the Zygoma-Related Rehabilitation: The (Revisited) Zygoma Success Code. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2020;35:366–378. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Higgins J.P., Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5. Wiley; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2011. p. 3. [Google Scholar]
Hirsch J.-M., Öhrnell L.-O., Henry P.J., Andreasson L., Brånemark P.-I., Chiapasco M., Gynther G., Finne K., Higuchi K.W., Isaksson S., et al. A Clinical Evaluation of the Zygoma Fixture: One Year of Follow-up at 16 Clinics. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2004;62((Suppl. S2)):22–29. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2004.06.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Peñarrocha-Diago M., Bernabeu-Mira J.C., Fernández-Ruíz A., Aparicio C., Peñarrocha-Oltra D. Bone Regeneration and Soft Tissue Enhancement Around Zygomatic Implants: Retrospective Case Series. Materials. 2020;13:1577. doi: 10.3390/ma13071577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Davó R., Malevez C., Rojas J., Rodríguez J., Regolf J. Clinical Outcome of 42 Patients Treated with 81 Immediately Loaded Zygomatic Implants: A 12- to 42-Month Retrospective Study. Eur. J. Oral Implantol. 2008;9((Suppl. S1)):141–150. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Chow J., Wat P., Hui E., Lee P., Li W. A New Method to Eliminate the Risk of Maxillary Sinusitis with Zygomatic Implants. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2010;25:1233–1240. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Stiévenart M., Malevez C. Rehabilitation of Totally Atrophied Maxilla by Means of Four Zygomatic Implants and Fixed Prosthesis: A 6-s40-Month Follow-Up. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2010;39:358–363. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Migliorança R.M., Coppedê A., Rezende R.C.L.D., De Mayo T. Restoration of the Edentulous Maxilla Using Extrasinus Zygomatic Implants Combined with Anterior Conventional Implants: A Retrospective Study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2011;26:665–672. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Maló P., Nobre M., Lopes A., Francischone C., Rigolizzo M. Three-year outcome of a retrospective cohort study on the rehabilitation of completely edentulous atrophic maxillae with immediately loaded extra-maxillary zygomatic implants. Eur. J. Oral Implantol. 2012;5:37–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Peñarrocha M., Carrillo C., Boronat A., Martí E. Level of satisfaction in patients with maxillary full-arch fixed prostheses: Zygomatic versus conventional implants. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2007;22:769–773. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Esposito M., Barausse C., Balercia A., Pistilli R., Ippolito D.R., Felice P. Conventional drills vs piezoelectric surgery preparation for placement of four immediately loaded zygomatic oncology implants in edentulous maxillae: Results from 1-year split-mouth randomised controlled trial. Eur. J. Oral Implantol. 2017;10:147–158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Pellegrino G., Relics D., Tarsitano A., Basile F., Grande F., Marchetti C. Computer-Assisted Surgery in the Rehabilitation of the Upper Jaw with Zygomatic Implants-a Cohort Study Comparing Atrophic and Oncologic Patients. Preliminary Results at 4 Years Follow-Up. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 2018;29:437. doi: 10.1111/clr.322_13358. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Wang C.I., Cho S.H., Ivey A., Reddy L.V., Sinada N. Combined bone and mucosa-supported 3D-printed guide for sinus slot preparation and prosthetically driven zygomatic implant placement. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2021 doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.02.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]