Статьи

BO'LAJAK INGLIZ TILI O'QITUVCHILARINING INTELLEKTUAL KOMPETENTLIGINI RIVOJLANTIRISHDA ADAPTIV O'QITISH TIZIMLARINING O'RNI

Том 4 № 52 (2026) 97-101

2026-06-05 Статьи CC BY 4.0 Open Access

Авторы

  • O‘rinov Rustambek Yoqubjonovich Farg‘ona davlat texnika universiteti O‘zbek tili va tillarni o‘qitish kafedrasi assistenti Pedagogika fanlari bo‘yicha falsafa doktori (PhD)
  • Musayev Musabek Ahmadjon o‘g‘li Farg‘ona davlat texnika universiteti Mexanika-mashinasozlik fakulteti 33-25 QXM guruh talabasi

Аннотация

Mazkur maqolada bo'lajak ingliz tili o'qituvchilarining intellektual kompetentligini rivojlantirishda adaptiv o'qitish tizimlarining o'rni va imkoniyatlari ilmiy-nazariy jihatdan tahlil etilgan. Adaptiv o'qitish tizimlarining asosiy xususiyatlari, ularning an'anaviy o'qitish metodologiyasidan farqlari va pedagogik ta'sirchanligi tadqiq qilingan. Sun'iy intellekt texnologiyalari asosidagi intellektual tizimlar bo'lajak o'qituvchilarning kognitiv, kommunikativ va metakognitiv kompetentliklarini shakllantirishdagi roli chuqur o'rganilgan. Ilmiy adabiyotlar tahlili, pedagogik kuzatuv va eksperimental ma'lumotlar asosida xulosalar shakllantirilib, amaliy tavsiyalar ishlab chiqilgan.

Ключевые слова:

adaptiv o'qitish tizimi intellektual kompetentlik sun'iy intellekt ingliz tili o'qituvchisi raqamli pedagogika shaxsga yo'naltirilgan ta'lim metakognitiv ko'nikma.

Библиографические ссылки

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's educational objectives. Longman.

Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.

Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2011). Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. In M. A. Gernsbacher et al. (Eds.), Psychology and the real world (pp. 56–64). Worth Publishers.

Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. David McKay Company.

Brown, J. S., & Burton, R. R. (1978). Diagnostic models for procedural bugs in basic mathematical skills. Cognitive Science, 2(2), 155–192.

Carbonell, J. R. (1970). AI in CAI: An artificial-intelligence approach to computer-assisted instruction. IEEE Transactions on Man-Machine Systems, 11(4), 190–202.

Corbett, A. T., & Anderson, J. R. (1994). Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4(4), 253–278.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.

Загрузки

Опубликован

2026-06-05

Выпуск

Том 4 № 52 (2026)

Раздел

Статьи

Лицензия

Copyright (c) 2026 Innovative Academy RSC

Лицензия Creative Commons

Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.

Как цитировать

O‘rinov, R., & Musayev, M. (2026). BO’LAJAK INGLIZ TILI O’QITUVCHILARINING INTELLEKTUAL KOMPETENTLIGINI RIVOJLANTIRISHDA ADAPTIV O’QITISH TIZIMLARINING O’RNI. Наука и инновации, 4(52), 97-101. https://www.in-academy.uz/index.php/SI/article/view/51210
Innovative Academy RSC
Article metrics Views and PDF downloads
2 Views
0 Downloads