MODERN TECHNOLOGIES IN MOTHER TONGUE LESSONS: INTERACTIVE WHITEBOARDS AND MULTIMEDIA PRESENTATIONS
Main Article Content
Аннотация:
This article explores the effective use of modern technologies, such as interactive whiteboards and multimedia presentations, in mother tongue lessons at the primary education level. The integration of digital tools into the teaching process enhances student engagement, improves comprehension, and promotes interactive learning. The study discusses the methodological approaches to applying these technologies in language instruction, highlights their pedagogical benefits, and provides practical examples of classroom implementation. It also addresses the challenges teachers may face and offers suggestions for effective use.
Article Details
Как цитировать:
Библиографические ссылки:
Alqahtani, M. (2021). The Effectiveness of Interactive Whiteboards in Enhancing Language Skills: A Meta-Analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10212-3
Cote, T., & Milliner, B. (2022). Enhancing L1 and L2 Instruction with Multimedia Tools: A Comparative Classroom Study. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 31(2), 89–106.
Gitsaki, C., & Robby, M. A. (2020). Teaching Language in the Digital Age: The Role of Smart Technologies in Mother Tongue Education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(20), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i20.16235
ogli Melikuziev, A. L. (2022). HISTORICAL AND MODERN CLASSIFICATION OF PARALINGUISTICS. Academicia Globe: Inderscience Research, 3 (10), 126–128.
Kervin, L., Comber, B., & Woods, A. (2023). Literacies in the Digital Age: Multimodal Practices and Pedagogies. Routledge.
Özdemir, E., & Kilic, H. (2021). The Use of Digital Storytelling in Mother Tongue Instruction: Effects on Student Engagement and Achievement. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 20(3), 22–31.
Weninger, C. (2022). Multimodality and Mother Tongue Instruction: Approaches for Meaningful Engagement. Language and Education, 36(4), 303–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2022.2039234
