MEASURING MARKET COMPETITION INTENSITY IN THE HOSPITALITY SECTOR
Main Article Content
Аннотация:
This study examines the intensity and evolution of market competition within the hospitality sector of Bukhara region, Uzbekistan, across the period 2022-2024, employing the Hannah-Kay concentration index as the primary analytical instrument. The research addresses the critical policy question of whether market liberalization and tourism sector expansion have generated competitive market structures conducive to service quality improvement and price efficiency. Utilizing comprehensive statistical data on service volumes from 17-18 accommodation establishments representing major hotels and tourist facilities across three consecutive years, the analysis computes market concentration indices with parametric specification α=1.5, appropriate for assessing overall market concentration dynamics. Empirical findings reveal Hannah-Kay index values of 14.47 for 2022, 14.95 for 2023, and 14.90 for 2024, substantially exceeding the monopoly threshold of 1.0 and indicating robust competitive market conditions throughout the observation period. The progressive increase from 2022 to 2023 suggests intensifying competition driven by new market entrants, particularly the opening of international chain hotel Wyndham Bukhara, while the slight stabilization in 2024 indicates market maturation. Market share analysis identifies Oriyent Star Varahsha and Wyndham Bukhara as market leaders with shares of 11.6% and 12.0% respectively in 2024, while no single establishment demonstrates dominant market power exceeding 15%, confirming dispersed market structure. The study contributes methodologically by demonstrating the applicability of concentration indices to hospitality sector analysis in emerging tourism markets, providing empirical baseline measurements for regulatory assessment, and offering theoretical insights regarding the relationship between market structure, service diversification, and quality competition in regional tourism contexts. Policy implications emphasize the importance of maintaining competitive market conditions through continued support for diverse establishment types including family-run guesthouses alongside international chains, quality certification programs, and monitoring mechanisms preventing anti-competitive consolidation. The findings support continued liberalization policies while suggesting targeted interventions to strengthen smaller establishments' competitive capabilities through training, financing access, and marketing support programs
Article Details
Как цитировать:
Библиографические ссылки:
Bain, J. S. (1956). Barriers to New Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Baumol, W. J., Panzar, J. C., & Willig, R. D. (1982). Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Hannah, L., & Kay, J. A. (1977). Concentration in Modern Industry: Theory, Measurement and the UK Experience. London: Macmillan.
Laffont, J. J., & Tirole, J. (1993). A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mason, E. S. (1939). Price and production policies of large-scale enterprise. American Economic Review, 29(1), 61-74.
Ministry of Tourism and Cultural Heritage of Uzbekistan. (2024). Tourism Development Strategy of the Republic of Uzbekistan through 2030. Tashkent: Government of Uzbekistan.
Panzar, J. C., & Rosse, J. N. (1987). Testing for 'monopoly' equilibrium. Journal of Industrial Economics, 35(4), 443-456.
Regional Statistics Department of Bukhara Region. (2024). Tourism Sector Statistical Bulletin 2022-2024. Bukhara: Regional Statistics Department.
Scherer, F. M., & Ross, D. (1990). Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Shepherd, W. G. (1997). The Economics of Industrial Organization (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Tirole, J. (1988). The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
UNESCO World Heritage Centre. (2023). Historic Centre of Bukhara. Paris: UNESCO.
United Nations World Tourism Organization (UNWTO). (2023). Tourism and Culture Synergies. Madrid: UNWTO.
World Bank. (2023). Uzbekistan Tourism Sector Development Project. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
World Travel & Tourism Council. (2024). Economic Impact Research: Uzbekistan. London: WTTC.
