THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS AND LINGUOCULTUROLOGY
Keywords:
Cognitive Linguistics, Linguoculturology, concept, conceptual metaphor, culture, worldview, national mentality, linguistic worldview, cognition.Abstract
This article examines the relationship between Cognitive Linguistics and Linguoculturology, two important branches of modern anthropocentric linguistics. The study discusses their theoretical foundations, common research objects, and methodological approaches. The findings confirm that Cognitive Linguistics and Linguoculturology complement each other in explaining the interaction between language, thought, and culture.
References
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fillmore, C. J. (1976). Frame Semantics and the Nature of Language. New York Academy of Sciences.
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Maslova, V. A. (2001). Linguoculturology. Moscow: Akademiya.
Telia, V. N. (1996). Russian Phraseology: Semantic, Pragmatic and Linguocultural Aspects. Moscow: Nauka.
Stepanov, Yu. S. (2004). Constants: Dictionary of Russian Culture. Moscow: Akademicheskiy Proekt.
Humboldt, W. von. (1999). On Language: The Diversity of Human Language Structure and Its Influence on the Mental Development of Mankind. Cambridge University Press.
Safarov, Sh. (2006). Cognitive Linguistics. Tashkent.
Mahmudov, N. (2012). In Search of Comprehensive Approaches to Language Research. Tashkent.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
