COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TERMINOLOGY IN UZBEK TRADITIONAL WEAVING AND ENGLISH ORIGIN TERMS: UNRAVELING CULTURAL SIGNIFIERS
Keywords:
Uzbek traditional weaving, terminology, comparative analysis, cultural exchange, linguistic influence.Abstract
This paper presents a comprehensive comparative study of the terminology utilized in Uzbek traditional weaving alongside terms of English origin. Uzbekistan's rich heritage in textile craftsmanship, particularly weaving, has garnered global attention for its intricate designs and cultural significance. However, as globalization continues to influence cultural exchanges, it becomes imperative to examine how terminology, particularly in the realm of weaving, reflects both traditional practices and external influences. Through a meticulous examination of terminology, this study aims to shed light on the nuances of Uzbek traditional weaving terminology compared to those of English origin, exploring the cultural, linguistic, and historical factors that shape these terminologies.
References
Binswanger, H. P., Rosenzweig, M. R. (1986). Behavioural and Material Determinants of Production Relations in Agriculture. Journal of Development Studies, 22(3), 503–539.
Borensztein, E., De Gregorio, J. and Lee, J. W. (1998). How Does Foreign Direct Investment Affect Economic Growth? Journal of International Economics, 45(1), 115-135.
Burkitbayeva, S., Qiam, M., Swinnen, J. (2016). A black (white) hole in the global spread of GM cotton. Trends in Biotechnology, 34 (4), 260-263
Djanibekov, N. (2016). Agricultural Restructuring, Water Scarcity and the Adaptation to Climate Change in Central Asia: A Five-Country Study (AGRIWANET). Presented at during the Kazakhstan research workshop, IAMO, Halle (Saale), February 10, 2016.
Djanibekov, N., van Assche, K., Bobojonov, I., Lamers, J. (2012). Farm Restructuring and Land Consolidation in Uzbekistan: New Farms with Old Barriers. Europe‐Asia Studies, 64, 1101– 1126
Pandey, P. (2013). Triple Helix for Communication of Innovations: Case Study of Bt Cotton in India. Asian Biotechnology & Development Review, 15(1), 21-42.
Petrick, M. and Djanibekov, N. (2015). Institutional change in land and labour relations of Central Asia’s irrigated agriculture (AGRICHANGE). Project description. IAMO.
Petrick, M. and Djanibekov, N. (2016). Obstacles to crop diversification and cotton harvest mechanisation: Farm survey evidence from two contrasting districts in Uzbekistan: IAMO Discussion Papers 153. Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Central and Eastern Europe (IAMO).
Pomfret, R. (2008). Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan, Ch 8. In Dostortions to Agricultural Incentives in Europe’s Transition Economies. K. Anderson and J. Swinnen (Eds.). World Bank, Washington, DC, pp. 297-338.
