WHAT IS ESP? BASIC CONCEPTIONS, PRINCIPLES, TYPES OF ESP.

Main Article Content

Аннотация:

In the context of globalization and professional mobility, English language education increasingly requires a shift from general proficiency toward purpose-oriented instruction. English for Specific Purposes (ESP) has emerged as an effective approach that aligns language learning with learners’ academic, professional, and occupational needs. Unlike General English, ESP emphasizes relevance, practicality, and contextualized language use within specific disciplines. The approach is grounded in needs analysis, which determines the linguistic content, skills, and communicative functions required in real-life professional situations. Core principles of ESP include learner-centeredness, authenticity of materials, and integration of subject-specific discourse. ESP is commonly categorized into academic, professional, and occupational types, each addressing distinct communicative demands. Through targeted instruction, learners develop not only linguistic competence but also the ability to perform effectively in specialized environments. As a result, ESP contributes significantly to improving the efficiency and applicability of English language education in higher education and professional training settings.

Article Details

Как цитировать:

Mirkomilova , M. ., & Azimova, M. . (2026). WHAT IS ESP? BASIC CONCEPTIONS, PRINCIPLES, TYPES OF ESP. Бюллетень студентов нового Узбекистана, 4(1), 30–36. извлечено от https://www.in-academy.uz/index.php/yota/article/view/71431

Библиографические ссылки:

Azimova, M. (2024). Kulgi semantikasi rivojida madaniy va psixologik asoslar. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13909649

Azimova, M. (2024). Lexical-semantic field of "laugh" in English and Uzbek in taxonomic aspect. Академические исследования в современной науке, 3(36), 71-75. Retrieved from https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/arims/article/view/50004

Azimova, M. (2024). The semantic field of crying (Yig’i semantik maydoni). Общественные науки в современном мире: теоретические и практические исследования, 3(10), 79-81. Retrieved from https://in-academy.uz/index.php/zdif/article/view/37346

Azimova, M. (2025). Semantik maydon konsepsiyasining lingvistik talqinlari. Lingvospektr, 6(1), 94-101. https://lingvospektr.uz/index.php/lngsp/article/view/917

Azimova, M. (2024). Teaching language based on tasks (TBLT): Theory and practice. Lingvospektr, 2(1), 116-119.

T. Hutchinson and A. Waters, English for Specific Purposes: A Learning-Centred Approach, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1987.

D. Dudley-Evans and M. J. St John, Developments in English for Specific Purposes, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

T. Johns and D. Dudley-Evans, “English for specific purposes,” Int. Rev. Appl. Linguist., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 297–322, 1991.

H. Basturkmen, Ideas and Options in English for Specific Purposes, London, UK: Routledge, 2006.

L. Flowerdew and M. Peacock, Research Perspectives on English for Academic Purposes, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

J. Swales, Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

B. Paltridge and S. Starfield, The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes, Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013.

J. Munby, Communicative Syllabus Design, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1978.

R. West, “Needs analysis in language teaching,” Lang. Teach., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 1994.

M. Long, “A role for instruction in second language acquisition,” Task-Based Lang. Teach., pp. 77–99, 1985.

D. Nunan, Task-Based Language Teaching, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

H. Douglas Brown, Principles of Language Learning and Teaching, 5th ed., New York, NY, USA: Pearson, 2007.

K. Hyland, English for Academic Purposes: An Advanced Resource Book, London, UK: Routledge, 2006.

A. Robinson, ESP Today: A Practitioner’s Guide, New York, NY, USA: Prentice Hall, 1991.

C. Candlin and D. Hall, “Teaching and researching ESP,” Lang. Teach., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 201–219, 2002.