EXPERIENCE OF USING INTERACTIVE METHODS IN FORMING STUDENTS' ECOLOGICAL AWARENESS
Article Sidebar
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
Main Article Content
Аннотация:
This article examines the pedagogical effectiveness of interactive teaching methods in developing students' environmental awareness. The study evaluates the use of case-based learning, debates, project-oriented tasks, gamification tools and field observations within environmental education. The findings indicate that interactive strategies significantly enhance students' ecological knowledge, analytical thinking skills and environmentally responsible behavior. The research highlights the contribution of these methods to strengthening environmental literacy and promoting active engagement in sustainability-oriented learning activities. Practical recommendations are provided for improving university-level ecological education through the integration of innovative instructional approaches
Article Details
Как цитировать:
Библиографические ссылки:
Capra, F., & Luisi, PL (2014). The systems view of life: A unifying vision. Cambridge University Press.
Sterling, S. (2021). Educating for the future we want: A systems approach to sustainability education. Journal of Sustainability Education, 26(4), 1–15.
UNESCO. (2020). Education for Sustainable Development: A roadmap 2020–2030. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
OECD. (2022). Green skills and environmental literacy for future-ready learners. OECD Publishing.
Uzbekistan Republic Ministers Court. (2019). “Green to the economy to go Strategy — 2030”. Tashkent: Official publication.
United Nations Environment Program (UNEP). (2021). Youth, education and environmental responsibility. UNEP Publications.
Tilbury, D. (2011). Education for sustainable development: An expert review of processes and learning. UNESCO.
Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260.
Gifford, R. (2014). Environmental psychology matters. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 541–579.
Hungerford, HR, & Volk, T. (1990). Changing learner behavior through environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 21(3), 8–21.
Leal Filho, W., Raath, S., Lazzarini, B., Vargas, VR, & others. (2018). The role of higher education in sustainable development: Evidence from global case studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 199, 143–160.
Krasny, ME, & Dillon, J. (Eds.). (2013). Trading zones in environmental education: Crossovers between formal and informal learning. Springer.
Uzbekistan Republic President's Decree. (2020). “Education system by 2030 develop strategy”. Tashkent: President press service.
Barkemeyer, R., Holt, D., Preuss, L., & Tsang, S. (2014). What happened to the 'development' in sustainable development? Sustainable Development, 22(1), 15–32.
Wang, J., & Shen, H. (2023). Artificial intelligence-enhanced environmental education: Opportunities and challenges. Computers & Education, 194, 104687.
Saleh, I., & Pendlebury, C. (2022). The role of digital platforms in promoting environmental literacy among youth. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 17(6), 321–338.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
Uzbekistan Ecology, environment protection to do and climate change Ministry of Youth. (2023). ecological literacy increase according to methodological guide. Tashkent.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.
Muro, M., & Yong, S. (2020). AI and sustainability: How artificial intelligence can support environmental goals. Brookings Institution Research Papers, 1–18.