A HISTORICAL OVERVIEW OVER FORMULAIC LANGUAGE AND THE RELATIONSHIP WITH PHRASEOLOGY
Article Sidebar
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
Main Article Content
Аннотация:
This article analyses the characteristics and roles of formulaic language from cognitive and linguistic viewpoints, emphasising how fixed and repetitive phrases enhance discourse structure, processing efficiency, and communication stability, particularly from historical contexts. The study employs a descriptive, corpus-informed, and historical-philological approach to identify the structural characteristics, functions, and transmission methods of formulaic units across various textual sources. The findings indicate that formulaic expressions function as reliable cognitive anchors, enhancing memory, alleviating cognitive load, and promoting coherence in both spoken and written communication. The study shows that the phenomenon is not as new as we might think, but has been reconsidered and reformulated due to progressively sophisticated linguistic theory; what we have of it in modern times makes a much better description of its cognitive underpinning. It is argued in the paper that these types of formulaic language are an inherent and universal dimension of linguistic behaviour, and that its investigation can offer important insights into mental representation, patterns of use, and discourse structure.
Article Details
Как цитировать:
Библиографические ссылки:
J. Elliott Casal, Jungwan Yoon, Frame-based formulaic features in L2 writing pedagogy: Variants, functions, and student writer perceptions in academic writing, English for Specific Purposes, Volume 71, 2023, Pages 102-114, ISSN 0889-4906, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2023.03.004. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889490623000297)
Franz, A. (1902). Die Messe im Mittelalter. Freiburg: Herder.
Taft, R. (1986). The Liturgy of the Hours in East and West. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press.
Geoffrey of Vinsauf. (1210/1968). Poetria Nova (E. Faral, Ed.). Paris: Champion.
Matthew of Vendôme. (1175/1981). Ars Versificatoria (A. J. Minnis, Ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Murphy, J. J. (1971). Three Medieval Rhetorical Arts. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lord, A. B. (1960). The Singer of Tales. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ong, W. J. (1982). Orality and Literacy. London: Routledge.
Beginning of the Prologue of Beowulf By Richard Barker Updated: November 15, 2023 https://www.thehistoryofenglish.com/beginning-prologue-beowulf
https://www.britishlibrary.cn/en/works/beowulf/
Blenkinsopp, Joseph (2011). Creation, Un-Creation, Re-Creation: A Discursive Commentary on Genesis 1–11. T&T Clarke International. ISBN 9780567372871.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_the_beginning_(phrase)
Al-Qalqashandi (d. 1418), Subh al-a‘sha fi sina‘at al-insha’, ed. ‘Abd al-Qadir Zakkar, Damascus, Wizarat al-Thaqafa, 1981.
Beal, P. (2011). A dictionary of English manuscript terminology, 1450–2000 (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acref/9780199576128.001.0001
Beal, P. (2008). A dictionary of English manuscript terminology, 1450–2000. Oxford University Press.
Vohidov, R., & Eshonqulov, H. (2006). O‘zbek mumtoz adabiyoti tarixi (Eng qadimgi davrlardan XVI asr oxirigacha). O‘zbekiston Yozuvchilar uyushmasi Adabiyot jamg‘armasi nashriyoti. P. 528.
H.D. Abdullayev. (2020). O‘zbek adabiyoti tarixi [History of Uzbek Literature]. O‘zbekiston Xalqaro Islom Akademiyasi Nashriyot-Matbaa Birlashmasi. Berdaq nomidagi Qoraqalpoq Davlat Universiteti, O‘zbekiston. P.154.
G‘. Abdurahmonov, Sh. Shukurov, & Q. Mahmudov. (2008). O‘zbek tilining tarixiy grammatlkasi fonetika, morfologiya va sintaksis. O‘zbekiston faylasufiari milliy jamiyati nashriyoti. Toshkent. P. 530.
Johanson, L., & Csató, É.Á. (Eds.). (2021). The Turkic Languages (2nd ed.). Routledge.P.512.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003243809 https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/edit/10.4324/9781003243809/turkic-languages-lars-johanson-%C3%A9va-csat%C3%B3
A.Wray (2002). Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. P.327. https://api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.9780511668814_A23679339/preview-9780511668814_A23679339.pdf
Pawley, Andrew & Frances H. Syder. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In Jack C. Richards & Richard Schmidt (eds.), Language and communication, 191–226. London: Longman.
Fillmore, C. J. (1976). Frame semantics and the nature of language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Conference on the Origin and Development of Language and Speech, 280(1), 20–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1982). Frame semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea, , ed., Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Seoul: Hanshin, pp. 111–138.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1979). On fluency. In C. J. Fillmore, D. Kempler, & W. S.-Y. Wang (Eds.), Individual differences in language ability and language behavior (pp. 85–101). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-255950-1.50012-3
Erman, Britt & Beatrice Warren. 2000. The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text 29(1). 29–62.
Nattinger, J. R., & DeCarrico, J. S. (1992). Studies on formulaic language in language use. Nattinger, James R. & Jeanette S. DeCarrico. 1993. Lexical phrases and strategic interaction. In James E. Alatis (ed.), Georgetown university roundtable on language and linguistics, 558–567. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press