THE PRAGMATIC FUNCTIONS OF ENANTIOSEMIC PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS IN CONTEMPORARY ENGLISH

Авторы

  • Mohinbonu Qahramonjonovna Madaminova PhD Researcher, Kokand State University Автор

Ключевые слова:

enantiosemia, phraseological units, auto-antonymy, pragmatic functions, contextual semantics, English literature, discourse analysis.

Аннотация

This article examines the pragmatic functions of enantiosemic phraseological units (idioms and fixed expressions containing inherent semantic contradiction or auto-antonymy) in contemporary English literature and media discourse. Enantiosemia within phraseology represents a complex linguistic phenomenon where a single expression can convey diametrically opposed meanings depending on contextual parameters, speaker intent, and stylistic emphasis. Drawing upon corpus-based analysis and academic insights indexed in Scopus and Google Scholar, this study categorizes key pragmatic roles of these units, including irony, mitigation, rhetorical ambiguity, and stylistic polarization. Through specific textual examples from classic and modern English literature, the paper demonstrates how auto-antonymous idioms serve as subtle instruments of interpersonal communication and cognitive styling.

Библиографические ссылки

Austen, J. (1813). Pride and Prejudice. London: Egerton. 432 p.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 345 p.

Child, L. (1997). Killing Floor. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons. 528 p.

Conrad, J. (1899). Heart of Darkness. Blackwood’s Magazine. 112 p.

Cruse, D. A. (2000). Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 424 p.

Dickens, C. (1859). A Tale of Two Cities. London: Chapman & Hall. 448 p.

Fitzgerald, F. S. (1925). The Great Gatsby. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons. 208 p.

Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 506 p.

Hardy, T. (1891). Tess of the d’Urbervilles. London: James R. Osgood, McIlvaine & Co. 592 p.

Lakoff, G. (2004). Don’t Think of an Elephant!: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing. 124 p.

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 420 p.

Moon, R. (1998). Fixed Expressions and Idioms in English: A Corpus-Based Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 356 p.

Orwell, G. (1945). Animal Farm. London: Secker and Warburg. 112 p.

Shakespeare, W. (1603). Hamlet. London: N. L. and John Trundell. 144 p.

Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell. 336 p.

Stubbs, M. (2001). Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell. 268 p.

Опубликован

2026-07-29

Как цитировать

Madaminova, M. (2026). THE PRAGMATIC FUNCTIONS OF ENANTIOSEMIC PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS IN CONTEMPORARY ENGLISH. Социальные науки в современном мире, 5(17), 53-58. https://www.in-academy.uz/index.php/ZDIF/article/view/55206
Innovative Academy RSC
Article metrics Views and PDF downloads
1 Views
0 Downloads