ADOLATLI VA TENG MUOMALA STANDARTI QAMROVI (FET)

Main Article Content

Аннотация:

Adolatli va teng muomala standarti (keyingi o'rinlarda “FET”) zamonaviy xalqaro investitsiya huquqida asos bo'lib xizmat qiladi.

Article Details

Как цитировать:

Qulmamatova, M. . (2023). ADOLATLI VA TENG MUOMALA STANDARTI QAMROVI (FET). Евразийский журнал права, финансов и прикладных наук, 3(6), 143–149. извлечено от https://www.in-academy.uz/index.php/EJLFAS/article/view/17694

Библиографические ссылки:

Xalqaro investitsiya shartnomalari

Germaniya-Iordaniya BIT (2007)

Shveytsariya-Xitoy BIT (2009)

Waste Management v. Mexico (n.68) para.98

Victor Pey Casado v. Chile (n. 113) para. 659

Robert Azinian and others v. Mexico, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/97/2 (NAFTA), Award, 1 Novemer 1999,para. 103

Chevron Corporation and Texaco Petroleum Company v. Ecuador, UNICITRAL/PCA Case No.34877, Partial Award on the Merits, 30 March 2010, para. 250

ATA Construction, Industrial and Trading Company v. Jordan, ICSID Case No. ARB/08/2, Award, 18 May 2010, para. 125

Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona, S.A. and Vivendi Universal, S.A. v. Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/19

S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL

Pope & Talbot Inc. v. The Government of Canada, UNCITRAL

Saluka v. Czech Republic (n. 12) para. 291

Mondev International Ltd.v. United States of America, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/99/2.

Neer and Neer (U.S.A.) v. United Mexican States, 4 R.I.A.A. 60 (2006) (15. October 1926)

Saipem S.p.A v. Bangladesh, ICSID case No. ARB/05/07

Biwater Gauff v. Tanzania (n.36) paras, 593-603

Cf. Consortium RFCC v. Maroc (n.58) para 51

Bureau Veritas, Inspection, Valuation, Assessment and Control, BIVAC BV v Paraguay

Rumeli Telekom A.S. and Telsim Mobil Telekomunikasyon Hizmetleri A.S. v. Republic of Kazakhstan, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/16

Joseph Charles Lemire v. Ukraine, ICSID Case No. ARB/06/18

Azurix Corp. v. Argentina (n.24) paras. 376-377

SGS v Paraguay [2014] ICSID Case No. ARB/07/29

Bank Melli Iran v. Council [2011] ECR I-11381, para. 47

International Thunderbird Gaming Corp v. Mexico, UNCITRAL (NAFTA), Arbitral Award, 26 January 2006, para. 200

Southern Pacific Properties (Middle East) Limited v. Arab Republic of Egypt [1988] ICSID Case No. ARB/84/3

Aleksandr Oraxelashvili, "Adolatli va teng muomala"ning me'yoriy asosi: xorijiy investitsiyalar to'g'risidagi umumiy xalqaro huquq?' (2008) Archiv des Völkerrechts, 46. Bd., No 1 < https://www.jstor.org/stable/40800207> 2021-yil 1-noyabrdan foydalanilgan

Kempbell Maklaxlan, Lorens Shor va Metyu Vayniger (n.38) 227

Kempbell Maklaxlan, Lorens Shor va Metyu Vayniger, Xalqaro investitsion arbitraj: asosiy printsiplar (Oxford University Press, 2007) 203.

UNCTAD, Jahon investitsiya hisoboti (Birlashgan Millatlar Tashkiloti, 2013) 101

UNCTAD, Jahon investitsiya hisoboti (Birlashgan Millatlar Tashkiloti, 2013) 101

Yan Paulsson, Xalqaro huquqda adolatni inkor etish (Kembrij universiteti nashriyoti, 2005)

Jesvald Salacuse, Investitsion shartnomalar qonuni (Oxford University Press, 2010) 221

Javobgar Amerika Qo'shma Shtatlarining Papa va Talbot bo'yicha tinglovdan keyingi taqdimoti, 2002 yil 8 iyul, p. 11.

Robert Jennings va Artur Uotts (tahrirlar), Oppenxaymning xalqaro huquqi (Oxford University Press, 2011) 82

Rudolf Dolzer va Kristof Shrayer, Xalqaro investitsiya huquqi tamoyillari (2 - nashr, Oksford universiteti nashriyoti 2012)

Santyago Montt, Investitsiya shartnomasi arbitrajida davlat javobgarligi (Hart, 2009) 62-74