AUTHENTIC MATERIAL INTEGRATION: STRATEGIES FOR ELIMINATING PRAGMATIC TRANSFER ERRORS

Main Article Content

Abstract:

This research focuses on developing and implementing a methodology for using authentic materials to eliminate pragmatic errors among English philology students. The formation of pragmatic competence requires the ability to use language appropriately in cross-cultural contexts. The study presents strategies for identifying, analyzing, and correcting pragmatic errors through authentic video, audio, and textual materials. Results from a 16-week experimental study involving 170 students indicate that exercises based on authentic materials improve students' understanding and practical application of pragmatic features by 42%. The research employed Discourse Completion Tasks, role-play scenarios, and retrospective verbalization methods.

Article Details

How to Cite:

Fayzulloeva , C. (2025). AUTHENTIC MATERIAL INTEGRATION: STRATEGIES FOR ELIMINATING PRAGMATIC TRANSFER ERRORS. Eurasian Journal of Academic Research, 5(11 Part 2), 124–131. Retrieved from https://www.in-academy.uz/index.php/ejar/article/view/68312

References:

Abdullayeva, S. (2020). Politeness strategies in Uzbek and English: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Intercultural Communication Studies, 15(3), 45-62.

Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2001). Evaluating the empirical evidence: Grounds for instruction in pragmatics. In K. R. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 13-32). Cambridge University Press.

Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Do language learners recognize pragmatic violations? Pragmatic versus grammatical awareness in instructed L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly, 32(2), 233-259. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587583

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Gilmore, A. (2007). Authentic materials and authenticity in foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 40(2), 97-118. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004144

Guariento, W., & Morley, J. (2001). Text and task authenticity in the EFL classroom. ELT Journal, 55(4), 347-353. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/55.4.347

Ishihara, N., & Cohen, A. D. (2010). Teaching and learning pragmatics: Where language and culture meet. Pearson Longman.

Jalolov, J. (2012). Request strategies among Uzbek learners of English. Central Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 23-41.

Karimova, D. (2018). Refusal strategies in English: A study of Uzbek EFL learners. Asian EFL Journal, 20(4), 156-178.

Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Blackwell.

Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Longman.

Mishan, F. (2005). Designing authenticity into language learning materials. Intellect Books.

Rose, K. R., & Kasper, G. (Eds.). (2001). Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Schmidt, R. (1993). Consciousness, learning and interlanguage pragmatics. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics (pp. 21-42). Oxford University Press.

Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 91-112. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/4.2.91